Peer Evaluations

Kayley Sewell:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Kayley Sewell’s articulation of the ePortfolio Welcome page as satisfactory because she integrated her ideas with the class thoroughly, but there were frequent moments of repetition.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Kayley Sewell’s articulation of her 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as satisfactory because she was articulative and had good interpretation of her selected quote. However, her presentation was unable to achieve outstanding explication because she did not answer every question required for the 10 Key Terms Exam Orals.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Kayley Sewell’s articulation of her gun control argumentative paper as satisfactory because she had a few inconsistent punctuation errors, but had good analysis.

Daniel Hong:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Daniel Hong’s articulation of his Gun Control Argumentative Paper as needs improvement because his speechifying abilities were not enunciated and he displayed frequent grammatical errors.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Daniel Hong’s articulation of his Mid-Semester 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as satisfactory because although he provides in-depth analysis on his latin phrase and exemplifies a coherent and thoughtful structure in his analytic writing, his speechifying abilities included frequent digressions in the form of stuttering and awkward disruptions.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Daniel Hong’s ePortfolio Welcome page as satisfactory as he had good integration of his idea with the journey that is ENG 2105, but his Writing Process page lacked some necessary details.

Vanessa Aviles:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Vanessa Aviles’ articulation of her ePortfolio Welcome page as outstanding because she appropriately integrated her graphic idea to the journey that is ENG 2105, and she provides a concise, yet thorough description of the Writing Process.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Vanessa Aviles’ articulation of her Mid-Semester 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as outstanding because she carefully integrates her Latin quote and provides thorough interpretation on the 10 key terms. Although she had occasional moments of digression, she managed to keep the audience engaged.

Nicole Murrillo:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Nicole Murrillo’s articulation of her Mid-Semester 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as outstanding as she gracefully integrated her Latin quote with herself and ENG 2105. Additionally, she explicated critical analysis on the 10 key terms.

Jonathan Rodriguez:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Jonathan Rodriguez’s articulation of his Mid-Semester 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as outstanding because he cleverly integrates his latin phrase with the journey that is ENG 2105, and his speechify abilities were immaculate as he cohesively articulated each point without digression.

Kimberly Martinez:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Kimberly Martinez’s articulation of her ePortfolio Welcome page as outstanding as she provided great detail when synthesizing her graphic idea with the journey that is ENG2105.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Kimberly Martinez’s articulation of her Mid-Semester 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as satisfactory as she offered and thoughtful interpretation of her Spanish quote. However, she had frequent filler digressions such as stating, “um.”

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Kimberly Martinez’s articulation of her Mid-Semester Pop Quiz Part 1 as satisfactory because she provides great analysis, but occasionally exemplifies poor use of linguistic facility.

Ethan Chavez:

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas, judges Ethan Chavez’s articulation of his Mid-Semester 10 Key Terms Exam Orals as needs improvement as he frequently displayed an incohesive articulation of ideas and long, awkward pauses for thought.

Yours truly, Trey Nicholas. judges Ethan Chavez’s articulation of his Mid-Semester Pop Quiz Part 1 as outstanding because he provides thoughtful analysis and weaves his evidence coherently.